Japan Today
environment

How global warming is reshaping winter life in Canada

13 Comments
By H Damon Matthews and Mitchell Dickau

As we begin to emerge out of yet another mild winter, Canadians are once again being reminded of just how acutely global warming has changed Canada’s winter climate.

The impacts of this mild winter were felt across the country and touched all aspects of winter culture. From melting ice castles at Québec’s winter carnival, to a dismal lack of snow at many western Canada ski resorts, seemingly no part of Canada was unaffected. But the change that will likely be felt most keenly by many Canadians is the loss of a reliable outdoor skating season.

For the second year running, Ottawa’s Rideau Canal Skateway was closed for what should be the peak of the skating season. In 2022-2023, the Skateway did not open at all for the first time ever. This winter, a portion of the Skateway opened briefly in January, but continuing mild temperatures forced a closure again after only four days of skating. In Montreal, fewer than 40 percent of the city’s outdoor rinks were open in the middle of February.

There is no obvious upside to this story. Outdoor skating in Canada is fast becoming the latest casualty of our failure to confront the reality of the climate crisis.

On thin ice

More than a decade ago, our research group published our first analysis of how outdoor skating was being affected by warming winter temperatures in Canada. We showed that even as of 2005, there was already evidence of later start dates, and shorter skating seasons across most of the country.

These conclusions were echoed by subsequent publications from the RinkWatch project, which has reported consistent declines in skating season length and quality in many Canadian cities.

Meanwhile in Ottawa, skating days on the Rideau Canal Skateway have been trending downwards over the last 20 years. In this time, the typical skating season has decreased by almost 40 per cent, a trend that is clearly correlated with increasing winter temperatures over the same period.

Moving in the wrong direction

Climate mitigation progress continues to be far too slow.

Global CO2 emissions reached their highest level ever recorded in 2023, and average global temperatures have now reached 1.3 C above pre-industrial temperatures. If these trends continue, we are on track to reach 1.5 C — the lower threshold of the Paris Agreement temperature target — in less than seven years.

In our 2012 paper, we estimated that suitable rink flooding days could disappear across most of southern Canada by mid-century. In a more recent analysis of Montreal’s outdoor rinks, we estimated that the number of viable skating days in Montréal could decrease to zero by as early as 2070.

In hindsight, these and other similar projections may have been far too optimistic. In a study of Rideau canal skating days published in 2015, the authors projected declining but sustained skating conditions throughout this century, even in a high future emissions scenario. The reality of the past two seasons shows that skating conditions have deteriorated far more quickly than predicted.

Global temperatures in 2023 were the highest ever recorded, as were winter temperatures in December 2023 and January. Since 1950, winter temperatures in Canada have increased by more than 3 C, which is about three times the rate of global warming over this same period.

Outdoor rinks require at least three consecutive very cold days to establish a foundation of ice, followed by enough cold days to maintain a good ice surface. Temperatures above freezing are poorly tolerated by outdoor rinks, and rain is often disastrous.

A few degrees of warming in January and February temperatures can be the difference between a rink that is skatable and one that is not. As winters continue to warm, the case for building and maintaining outdoor municipal rinks will become harder to justify.

A stark and still changing new reality

As years go by without any real progress on climate mitigation, it is becoming increasingly difficult to imagine a future in which outdoor rinks will be widely available without artificial refrigeration. Other winter activities will also be affected by changing snow conditions, but outdoor skating will likely be hit first in direct response to warming winter temperatures.

Wayne Gretzky famously learned to skate and play hockey in Branford, Ontario, in the 1960s on an outdoor rink built by his father. Reliable winter skating conditions in southern Ontario are already mostly a thing of the past, and are becoming more and more scarce as global warming progresses. It is increasingly unlikely that current and future generations will be able to follow Gretzky’s path.

This reality is both a tragic injustice for many young Canadians and an existential threat to a core aspect of the Canadian winter identity.

Preserving what remains of Canada’s winter skating culture will require that we rapidly step up our efforts to drive down CO2 emissions and stabilize global temperatures. Otherwise, Joni Mitchell’s “river I could skate away on” will become an increasingly wishful dream that soon will exist only in the lyrics of old songs.

H Damon Matthews is a professor and climate scientist, Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University. Mitchell Dickau is a PhD Candidate, Geography, Planning, and Environment Department, Concordia University.

The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

© The Conversation

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

13 Comments
Login to comment

There is no obvious upside to this story. Outdoor skating in Canada is fast becoming the latest casualty of our failure to confront the reality of the climate crisis.

Lots of people will die or fall into poverty, hundreds of species will face extinction, nations will likely cease to exist. But what is what makes some people finally pay attention? outdoor skating...

2 ( +10 / -8 )

Outdoor ice skating is a highly visible and easily-identifiable effect; much more obvious than poverty or extinction. No doubt the Canadian government threw unlimited taxpayer funding at Concordia University to underwrite this 'research'.

2 ( +7 / -5 )

People are much more attentive when something personally affects them. It's a good example for Canadian people, who may be relatively less affected by climate change.

Lots of people will die or fall into poverty, hundreds of species will face extinction, nations will likely cease to exist. But what is what makes some people finally pay attention? outdoor skating...

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Interesting personal opinion by a sole "scientist".

-5 ( +5 / -10 )

Interesting personal opinion by a sole "scientist".

Human cause climate change is a scientific consensus.

0 ( +9 / -9 )

Human cause climate change is a scientific consensus.

Interesting personal opinion by an "anonymous" poster..

-6 ( +7 / -13 )

Interesting personal opinion by an "anonymous" poster..

Nothing personal about this, nor sourced in anonymous people, it is widely reported and clearly known by anybody with interest in the topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change

85 references to support this point.

1 ( +8 / -7 )

I just skimmed quickly, was the phrase climate change used in the article maybe I just missed it. Any case I wonder why it seems to be used less nowadays

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

Lots of people will die or fall into poverty, hundreds of species will face extinction, nations will likely cease to exist.

Of course, anyone with even a passing familiarity with the facts knows this to be false.

https://humanprogress.org/the-collapse-of-climate-related-deaths-2/

Climate-related deaths have fallen over 99 percent since 1920, thanks to human adaptation. This article examines how Galveston reduced hurricane fatalities by 99 percent in 15 years and how the world has become 13,260 percent safer from climate-related death. It also warns against the “CNN effect” that exaggerates the frequency and severity of climate disasters

The "CNN effect". Perfect.

Goes to show how people who limit their news to the likes of CNN literally have no idea of reality.

-5 ( +5 / -10 )

https://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/the-fake-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change

This article makes the argument that there cannot possibly be an unanimous agreement on a scientific theory because such an agreement cannot even be reached on, and I quote, "whether men really landed on the moon". Astoundingly, after putting this gem into writing it still expects to be taken seriously.

It goes on to regurgitate the antiscientific trope that not merely doubts the scientific consensus but denies the existence of a scientific consensus altogether. It argues that a consensus is "a spontaneous agreement among people who are free to disagree", thus either completely misunderstanding, but far more likely intentionally misrepresenting what a scientific consensus is.

I believe this antiscientific let's-call-it-opinion piece does not deserve to be discussed any further.

2 ( +8 / -6 )

Elsewhere in the news, whales {who cannot travel large distances under the ice} are now using the Northwest Passage to travel from the Pacific to the Atlantic, and the Arctic region is forecast to be largely ice free by the end of the century.

So, not only no ice skating in Southern Canada, but not in Northern Canada as well.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Also in the news.....

the Arctic ice was first 3D mapped in the 1950s by US atomic powered submarines. At that time the multi year ice, about 12 feet thick, extended over a large area of the Arctic Ocean. More lately, the multi year 12 foot thick ice has been measured as covering only about 1/4th of the area that it did 70 years ago. While there is a lot of relatively thin ice visible in satellite photos of the Arctic, most of the multi year ice has already melted.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Of course, anyone with even a passing familiarity with the facts knows this to be false.

Then how come every well known institution of science in a related field support this conclusion?

Against this what evidence can you provide? one thing is for humans to make advances in safety and security against disasters of regular intensity, there is no realistic way for this to continue when changes as drastic and variate as predicted will come to happen making even keeping current measures much more difficult. There is a reason why there is an actual scientific consensus about the seriousness of the problem between the people that know the most about climate, pretending everybody is wrong because of simple, obvious reasons that somehow nobody has considered is not a rational position to take. Is like believing the moon is actually made of cheese just that nobody thought about testing the rocks brought back to confirm it.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites